How the Australian Government’s digital projects are performing

This section sets out how digital projects are performing. Digital projects present unique challenges and the reforms set out in previous sections are playing a key role in ensuring the conditions exist for each and every project included in this report to succeed.

Projects worth $7.3 billion of total budget are on-track

Consistent DCAs for major digital projects provide an overview of each project’s performance, spotlighting where support is needed most. This transparency also aids in reforms aimed at creating optimal conditions for digital projects to succeed and enhance public services and people’s lives.

Across the 2 years of reporting, the DCAs show many projects in the portfolio are on track to deliver agreed outcomes. This reflects the easing of technology supply disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing investment in strengthening how the Australian Government designs and delivers its digital projects.

Total number and budget of projects in each delivery confidence rating category (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

Graphic showing the total number and budget of projects in each delivery confidence rating category (Tier 1 and Tier 2). For the full contents of this graphic, see the 'image description' accordion below.

Changes in delivery confidence

New major digital projects are generally starting off well with more than three-quarters reporting High or Medium-High delivery confidence.

The government’s digital projects are being delivered against a backdrop of rapid and continuous technological change. This dynamic environment is reflected in the changes in delivery confidence ratings over the past year as projects move through different stages in their development.

Delivery confidence of projects which have newly entered central oversight

A graph showing the delivery confidence of closed projects. See the 'image description' accordion below for the data.

Understanding overall changes in delivery confidence to target engagement and reforms

Most (75.9%) of the 29 Tier 1 and 2 projects entering oversight since February 2024 report a High or Medium-High delivery confidence. These projects commonly report factors contributing to their delivery confidence rating at the start as: establishing effective governance early; having well-prepared documentation and artefacts; and ensuring experienced and capable personnel were ready.

This is an early sign that investment to strengthen digital project design processes is increasing overall delivery confidence. Projects often start with lower levels of delivery confidence, but the recent emphasis on ensuring mature planning is in place before projects start appears to be paying dividends, with more than three-quarters of these new projects entering oversight reporting High or Medium-High confidence. This contrasts with the United Kingdom where ‘it is not unusual for projects to be rated as Red earlier in their lifecycle, when scope, benefits, costs and delivery methods are still being explored’ (Infrastructure and Projects Authority 2024 p.13).

Reforms supporting success – partnering with industry to deliver digital projects

Recognising the crucial role of technology vendors in delivering the Australian Government’s ambitions for digital transformation, the Digital and ICT Investment Oversight Framework includes ‘sourcing’ as an area of focus. As part of this, the DTA coordinates marketplaces and agreements designed to enable agencies to easily access technology goods and services to support their digital projects. In 2023–24, the Australian Government sourced more than $6.4 billion of digital products and services from industry via these marketplaces and agreements. By accessing these arrangements through the BuyICT platform, agencies benefited from the Australian Government’s collective buying power and strengthened terms and conditions.

The DTA’s latest ICT labour hire and professional services panel, the Digital Marketplace Panel 2, adopts the APS Career Pathfinder dataset and Skills Framework for the Information Age (SFIA) to classify ICT labour hire opportunities. The classification of roles and greater panel pricing transparency provides clearer signals for in-demand skills, their costs and potential shortages that will inform delivery capacity and confidence in digital projects. The top in-demand digital and ICT skills sourced by the APS include software engineer, solution architect and business analyst.

Nearly two thirds of the Tier 1 and 2 projects are on track

Projects reporting High or Medium-High delivery confidence
Total projects (Tier 1 and 2)62
Number with High or Medium-High delivery confidence38
Percentage with High or Medium-High delivery confidence61.3%
Total budget with High or Medium-High delivery confidence$7.3 billion
Note: High or Medium-High delivery confidence indicates projects are on track to deliver agreed outcomes.

Common success factors among projects rated High or Medium-High are:

  • experienced staff on the project team
  • effective governance models keeping pace with the needs of the project
  • mature approaches to risk and issue management
  • effective partnering and collaboration between agencies and delivery partners.

Reforms supporting success – preparing senior leaders to lead digital projects successfully

Senior Responsible Officials for digital projects have a key role in ensuring these projects succeed in delivering expected benefits on schedule and on budget. To support these officials, a mandatory program is starting early this year to ensure they are equipped to confidently lead digital projects successfully. This program includes a simulation of a digital project across its life with a focus on building capability in assurance, benefits management, governance, project remediation, and commercial acumen. Following final trials, the program will be available through the Australian Public Service Academy and mandated for all leaders of the major digital projects included in this report.

While most projects are on-track, some projects are reporting lower levels of delivery confidence

Projects reporting Medium or lower delivery confidence
Total projects (Tier 1 and 2)62
Number with Medium or Lower delivery confidence23
Percentage of total projects with Medium or lower delivery confidence37.1%
Total budget of projects with Medium or lower delivery confidence$3.5 billion
Tier 1 projects with Medium or lower delivery confidence45.0%
Tier 2 projects with Medium or lower delivery confidence33.3%

As this table shows, a higher proportion of Tier 1 projects (45.0%) are reporting a delivery confidence of Medium or lower compared with Tier 2 projects (33.3%), likely reflecting the added risks and complexities inherent to these projects.

Common themes among projects rated Medium or lower are:

  • dependencies on changes to, or introduction of, new legislation
  • the complex nature of the technological solutions being implemented – including where integration of systems across organisations and even jurisdictions is required to achieve outcomes
  • where digital transformation is occurring alongside major organisational changes, or at a pace the organisation is struggling to sustain (for example, due to multiple concurrent digital projects putting pressure on an agency’s enterprise capability)
  • challenges attracting and retaining staff with the required skills including in digital disciplines such as cyber security, as well as in project/program management disciplines such as benefits, change, risk, budget management and integrated scheduling.

Projects reporting lower levels of delivery confidence are generally challenged by more than one of these themes. As noted in the July 2023 Review of the Modernising Business Registers Program, ‘the difficulty of effectively implementing a digital and ICT transformation project increases exponentially with each additional layer of complexity’ (Treasury 2023 p. 338).

Reforms supporting success – reducing risk through robust assurance and governance

Parallel development of legislation and digital capabilities can lead to significant delivery risks, including budget overruns, delays and, in extreme cases, project failures. Sometimes urgent factors make this concurrent work necessary, but where this occurs the associated risk must be managed carefully.

For high-risk digital projects, robust assurance and governance are crucial. The DTA seeks to mitigate risk by adding central funding and governance controls. An example is recommending the government quarantine part or all project funding, releasing it upon successful early discovery work and other proof points that indicate likely successful delivery.

Some continuing projects are reporting delivery difficulties

Sankey diagram showing Change in delivery confidence of projects that were included in the February 2024 report. For the full contents of the diagram, see the 'image description' accordion below.

Note: One project reporting a high delivery confidence in February 2024 is no longer reported since being reclassified from a Tier 2 to a Tier 3. This project now falls outside the scope for inclusion of delivery confidence information.

Of the 17 continuing Tier 1 and 2 projects that reported delivery confidence in February 2024, 11 projects either maintained or dropped in delivery confidence to Medium or lower in February 2025. These projects are routinely managing 3 or more delivery challenges that affected their assessments. Common trends include: financial pressures; scope complexities; resourcing constraints; tight schedules; technical issues; and a need to improve project management maturity.

While the goal is to see DCAs improving over time, it is common for delivery issues to worsen before they improve, especially when complex technical issues are involved. Some projects reporting lower DCAs are depending on the successful delivery of other projects as part of a wider reform program. While they have been closely monitoring delivery, setbacks in other projects can result in these projects being delayed, as key components required to stay on track become unavailable when needed.

Reforms supporting success – using new ways of collecting data to enable timely support and course corrections

In July 2024, the DTA began a Project Data Reporting Standard (PDRS) trial. The trial is testing a new approach to enable more seamless and timely central tracking of project performance across the Australian Government, using ‘natural systems’.

Using ‘natural systems’ means project data is collected from internal reporting projects are preparing for their governance boards, rather than requiring agencies to prepare specific reporting for central tracking purposes.

This approach is:

  1. improving the quality of reporting and advice the DTA can provide to stakeholders across the Australian Government – including by enabling data to be collected more frequently
  2. supporting decision-making by ensuring digital governance boards consistently have the minimum necessary information required to enable good decisions (a condition of the trial is that a minimum set of information must be provided to the board)
  3. improving the experience of agencies providing data to the DTA in our oversight role.

The trial is enabling more timely and effective central oversight of digital projects, helping ensure support can be provided where it needed most and at the earliest stage when the chance of charting a course back to green is greatest.

Disclaimer

“Certain numbers in this report have been rounded to one decimal place. Due to rounding, some totals may not correspond with the sum of the separate figures.” 

References

Projects that left the portfolio

Connect with the digital community

Share, build or learn digital experience and skills with training and events, and collaborate with peers across government.