Projects that left the portfolio
Digital projects are delivering enormous benefits for Australians - changing, improving and even saving lives. This section sets out recently completed and closed projects exploring how they performed and what benefits they delivered. It also reflects on how improvements to closure processes are ensuring that future projects systematically learn from past experience.
A range of projects across all investment tiers left the portfolio
Since February 2024, 25 projects have formally closed. These projects were delivered across 13 different agencies and had a combined value of $1.9 billion.
Tier | Projects | Total budget | Median total budget | Average duration |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Flagship digital investments | 3 | $1.1 billion | $150.9 million | 3.8 years |
2 Strategically significant digital investments | 10 | $631.4 million | $40.3 million | 3.2 years |
3 Significant digital investments | 12 | $219.7 million | $17.6 million | 1.6 years |
The average duration of closed projects was 2.5 years. Closed Tier 1 projects had a longer average duration than Tier 2 and Tier 3 projects. This longer average duration is mainly due to the inclusion of a closed 7-year Tier 1 project to improve weather and climate data.
Delivering benefits for Australians
The projects that closed since February 2024 have delivered significant benefits in areas as diverse as aged care, weather and climate data, and protection from scams. For example, Australians are now benefiting from closed projects that focused on:
- Bill relief – enabling the government to deliver targeted and temporary relief on power bills to eligible Australian households and small businesses
- Scam protection – protecting Australian consumers from online scams by taking down investment scam and phishing websites through enhanced data sharing and analytics capabilities
- Aged care – improving the quality of aged care by:
- providing more efficient and high-quality data exchange between aged care providers and government
- providing aged care providers with a more streamlined, secure and user-friendly financial reporting experience
- Weather and climate data – improving public access to Australia’s weather and climate data to enable better hazard preparedness and responses for the Australian community and industry
- Waste and resource recovery – improving national waste and resource recovery data to enable Australian consumers to make more informed choices
- Digital trade – developing better digital trade services to enable the trade industry to interact with relevant government agencies.
Finishing up – how projects leaving the portfolio performed
Of the 13 Tier 1 and Tier 2 projects that closed, 10 (76.9%) reported a High or Medium-High delivery confidence. Just 2 projects had a rating of Medium or lower, while one project did not report a delivery confidence rating.
Between February 2024 and February 2025, and before closing, 4 of these projects improved their delivery confidence, and 3 projects stayed the same. Comparisons for the remaining projects are not possible as they did not report a delivery confidence in February 2024.

Challenges and lessons learned
Projects that closed since February 2024 generally reported underspends. Those that went over budget reported issues including initial scoping not accounting for the full complexity of required work.
Some projects faced challenges in their ability to deliver against their original schedule due to delays getting bills introduced to Parliament, delays with equipment supply related to the COVID-19 pandemic, post-release issues that needed to be addressed, and additional enhancements that needed to be delivered to achieve expected outcomes.
Common lessons learned include:
- allocating sufficient time to early planning pre- implementation (preparation) stages, including ensuring a deep understanding of current state processes
- developing collaborative working relationships between stakeholders during scoping, delivery planning and decision-making – including efficient knowledge transfer and upskilling as needed
- defining project scope in as much detail as possible, to avoid confusion in deliverables and align project outcomes with stakeholder expectations
- enhancing financial management and budget control – including to enable tracking of earned value during implementation.
‘Lessons learned’ are often thought of as emerging from failures – but lessons from successful projects can be just as valuable. The DTA is systematically working to ensure project closure processes capture these lessons to ensure future projects have the best chance of success.
The importance of closure reports
Formal closure of a project is more than just the project finishing. Driving improved project performance over time requires careful consideration of how active projects have performed, and how what has been learned should change the way projects are designed and delivered in future. Strengthened central oversight has this ‘system learning’ at its centre with the DTA ensuring lessons aren’t just identified but rather systematically learned across all major digital projects through real change which makes the difference.
Project closure reports play a vital role in this ‘system learning’ and, as closure reports have varied in quality, a closure reporting standard has been developed to ensure consistency and maximise the value of these reports.
Reforms supporting success – improving project closure reports
To formally close a project, agencies must provide a project closure report to all key stakeholders. However, some reports have included extensive information, requiring more resources than necessary, while others have not included enough information to accurately assess the project’s performance.
As a result, the DTA developed the Closure Reporting Standard for Digital and ICT-enabled projects. The standard provides a minimum and consistent set of information for reports based on 7 criteria – scope, schedule, budget, assurance, benefits realisation, transition arrangements, and lessons learned. By standardising closure reporting, the DTA is promoting best practice and providing the necessary information to evaluate completed projects and inform future investments.
The DTA is drawing on expertise from across the APS and working with the Australian Taxation Office to develop templates to support implementation of the standard.
Disclaimer
“Certain numbers in this report have been rounded to one decimal place. Due to rounding, some totals may not correspond with the sum of the separate figures.”